Battery Storage Risks and Insurability Shaping the Future of Digital Economy

Michał Olszewski

3 Min Read

Investments in BESS are not merely technical upgrades; they are strategic moves to enhance a country’s energy resilience in an increasingly interconnected and data-driven world.

As the world accelerates towards a digital and sustainable future, Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESS) are emerging as a cornerstone of modern power infrastructure. Their ability to stabilise grids, integrate renewable energy, and ensure continuity of supply is now fundamental to the digital transition of national energy systems. Investments in BESS are not merely technical upgrades; they are strategic moves to enhance a country’s energy resilience in an increasingly interconnected and data-driven world.

The Evolving Role of Battery Storage in Today’s Energy Landscape

While lithium-ion battery technology has been a topic of industry discussion for over a decade, large-scale deployment has only gained momentum in the past three years. The number of operational and planned projects continues to rise, and the pool of technology manufacturers has expanded significantly. During this period, industry standards have matured, and both battery technology and risk management systems have advanced. Today, the sector predominantly utilises lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, supported by intelligent management and prevention systems.

This steady improvement in risk quality has been met with a positive response from the insurance market. BESS projects now occupy a vital place in renewable energy insurance portfolios, helping to balance exposures across different generation assets. Initially, insurers’ greatest concerns centred on the chemical reactions within batteries, particularly uncontrolled temperature increases. However, technological progress has increased insurers’ comfort, enabling them to distinguish between high- and low-quality risks, which in turn has led to gradual improvements in insurance terms and pricing.

Decoding the Critical Elements of BESS Risk Assessment

Despite these advances, insurers still view energy storage technology as presenting a unique set of challenges. Demand for BESS devices currently outstrips production, resulting in extended lead times. Many projects are bespoke, requiring compatibility between components and making rapid replacement difficult in the event of damage. The technology’s relative novelty, combined with high-profile incidents (notably fires), means insurers remain cautious.

Insurers require a comprehensive range of information to assess BESS risks. Key factors influencing the price and scope of cover include: the technology used, the manufacturer and contractor’s experience, system design and container spacing, test results, availability of critical spare parts, and details of preventive measures against natural disasters.

Major Insurance Claims in BESS Installations

Causes of losses in BESS installations are varied, ranging from manufacturing defects to external factors. Investigations into BESS fires have identified three common causes:

  • Inadequate protection and control systems (e.g., against overvoltage)
  • Poor management of the operating environment
  • Faulty installation

Broader causes include:

  • Thermal events, such as temperature rises due to air conditioning or ventilation failures, or incorrect design parameters
  • Electrical events, such as short circuits from cell defects or overvoltage
  • Mechanical events, including cell damage during manufacturing, installation, or operation

Exothermic reactions can trigger uncontrolled thermal runaway, leading to rapid, intense fires and the release of large volumes of heat and toxic gases. Once initiated, these fires are difficult to extinguish and may reignite hours or days after the initial event. The only effective mitigation is sustained cooling or quarantining damaged cells until fully discharged. While sprinkler systems can cool the source, they cannot extinguish such fires outright.

Recent High-Profile BESS Fire Incidents Underscore Ongoing Industry Risks

  • Between 2017 and 2019, South Korea experienced 23 major BESS fires, with damages exceeding USD 32 million.
  • Europe saw significant fires in Belgium (2017) and Liverpool, England (2020).
  • In the USA, a 2019 fire at a 20 MW facility resulted in fatalities, despite the presence of advanced safety systems.
  • In Beijing (April 2021), a fire at a 25 MWh facility was attributed to material fatigue.
  • In Victoria, Australia (August 2021), a fire during testing at a 300 MW/450 MWh project spread rapidly between containers.
  • In California (September 2021 and January 2025), overheating and fire incidents at some of the world’s largest BESS facilities were contained thanks to robust safety measures, but the risk remains significant.

The Road Ahead

As energy storage becomes the backbone of digital power systems, insuring these assets demands an increasingly tailored approach. The growing popularity and technological advancement of BESS have prompted insurers to expand capacity, confirming the sector’s attractiveness. However, as the scale and number of projects increase, so too do the challenges of risk management and the need for innovative insurance solutions.

Michał Olszewski

General Manager Risk & Insurance Technique
GrECo Poland

T +48 797 198 850

Related Industries & Solutions

Share this article

Related Insights

Looking ahead, several trends are expected to shape the health and benefits market in Slovenia over the next few years.
Slovenia is undergoing significant health reforms aimed at improving the overall healthcare system.
By improving the quality of healthcare services and making them more accessible, these health reforms are set to bring about significant changes in the Slovenian healthcare landscape